Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 48-57, March 2010

Linked Total Elbow Arthroplasty

  • Matthew L. Ramsey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Matthew L. Ramsey, MD, Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Shoulder and Elbow Service, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

Linked total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is differentiated from unlinked arthroplasty by virtue of the captured articulation of the humeral and ulnar components. This physical linkage provides distinct advantages compared with implants where no linkage exists. However, there are some theoretic disadvantages as well. There are several linked implant systems in use in the USA. Each implant system shares the common feature of being linked and possessing a degree of laxity. However, there are unique design features of each system. Unfortunately, there is no available data comparing the outcomes using different systems. The results of linked TEA will be reviewed with particular attention to the underlying pathology. This will highlight the conditions where available implants perform well and conditions that continue to challenge current implants.

Keywords: linked arthroplasty, arthroplasty design, pathology specific results

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1048-6666(09)00119-0

doi:10.1053/j.oto.2009.09.009

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 48-57, March 2010