Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 183-189, July 2007

The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Lumbar Spine

  • Stewart M. Kerr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Chadi Tannoury, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Andrew P. White, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • David Hannallah, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
  • ,
  • Richard C. Mendel, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ.
  • ,
  • D. Greg Anderson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Greg Anderson, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University and The Rothman Institute, 925 Chestnut St, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Specific surgical advances of the last several decades have enabled spinal surgeons to increasingly preserve more of the normal tissue in efforts to enhance postoperative results. Improvements in viewing technologies, including microscopy, have been a major step. The development of specialized surgical instruments and implants also have allowed for the design of spine procedures that do not require the traditional extent of tissue dissection. A wide variety of spinal pathologies, such as spinal stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, and some forms of spinal instability, may be managed successfully with minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. New skills must be mastered to perform safe and effective minimally invasive spine surgery; these new techniques have an inherent learning curve. However, these procedures can be learned through instruction and rely on many of the same principles that practiced spine surgeons are familiar with. Minimally invasive spine surgery may have the potential to significantly reduce perioperative morbidity. Well-designed clinical studies are still needed, however, to compare the benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery with traditional management.

Keywords: image guidance, interbody fusion, minimally invasive spine surgery, pedicle screw, percutaneous instrumentation, tubular dilator, tubular retractor

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1048-6666(07)00049-3

doi:10.1053/j.oto.2007.04.005

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 17, Issue 3 , Pages 183-189, July 2007