Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 286-291 , October 2006

Clinical Outcomes After Cartilage Injury and Repair

  • James J. Irrgang, PhD, PT, ATC

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to James J. Irrgang, PhD, PT, ATC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Room 911, Kaufman Building, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

References 

  1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001;
  2. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis. 1985;38:27–36
  3. Messick S. In:  RL Linn editors. Validity: educational measurement. New York, NY: The American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education; 1989;p. 13–103
  4. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop. 1985;198:43–49
  5. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Odensten M, et al. Evaluation of cruciate ligament injuries: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988;59:336–341
  6. Kocher MS, Steadman R, Briggs KK, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2004;86-A:1139–1145
  7. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati Knee Rating System in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:402–416
  8. Irrgang JJ, Synder-Mckler L, Wainner RS, et al. Development of a patient-reported measure of funtion of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80-A:1132–1145
  9. Marx RG. Letter to the editor: patient-reported measure of knee function. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82-A:1199–1202
  10. Irrgang JJ. Development of a health related quality of life instrument to assess physical function related to pathology and impairment of the knee. 1999;Thesis (PhD), University of Pittsburgh
  11. Bellamy N, Watson Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840
  12. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998;8:439–448
  13. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001;78:88–96
  14. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600–613
  15. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1567–1573
  16. Anderson AF, IIrrgang JJ, Kocher M. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form: Data from a nationally representative sample. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:128–135
  17. Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen A, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83-A:1459–1469

PII: S1048-6666(06)00085-1

doi: 10.1053/j.oto.2006.09.006

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 286-291 , October 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution