Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 5-19, January 2005

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A literature review of the anatomy, biomechanics, surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes

  • Leslie S. Beasley, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Leslie S. Beasley, MD, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Sports Medicine, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203
  • ,
  • Daniel E. Weiland, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Armando F. Vidal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Anikar Chhabra, MD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Andrea S. Herzka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Matthew T. Feng

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • ,
  • Robin V. West, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are some of the most common knee injuries seen by sports medicine physicians. However, given the complex anatomy and function of the ACL, reconstruction of this ligament is anything but straightforward. The last decade has seen much advancement in ACL reconstruction, with an improved knowledge of the biology and biomechanics of graft incorporation, new choices for graft material and graft fixation devices, and more accelerated rehabilitation protocols. Although there are numerous studies in the literature on ACL reconstruction, there is yet to be a consensus among surgeons on the “best” graft choice and the “optimal” fixation device. This is generally attributed to the small sample size in most studies, which prohibits a definite conclusion of superiority of one technique over another. Additionally, it is difficult to directly compare the results from one study to another because there is tremendous heterogeneity between studies. This review is intended to examine the anatomy, biomechanics, surgical considerations, and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction that have been highlighted in the literature during the past 10 years.

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction , ACL anatomy , ACL biomechanics , ACL outcomes , knee ligament , review

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1048-6666(04)00090-4

doi:10.1053/j.oto.2004.11.003

Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 5-19, January 2005